> ## Documentation Index > Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.attensira.com/llms.txt > Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further. # How to win one answer > The win plan for a single prompt: per model, what decided the answer, which rung you are on, the one next action, and when we read it again. [Who decides an answer](/measure/deciding-sources) tells you which pages the models leaned on. The **win plan** turns that into one thing to do — per model, with the evidence under it and the date we will find out whether it worked. ## One action per model, never a list A plan with five actions per model is a plan nobody works. So each model gets: * **Up to five deciding sources**, each with its share, its **n**, and whether you are on it already. * **A rung**: `proven` (you are cited among the pages that decide this answer), `better` (you are cited and a competitor sits above you), or `new` (nothing of yours is there). * **One next action**: fix a page, get listed, pitch a listing, answer a thread, or write something cite-able that does not exist yet — with the page or domain to work on and the citations it rests on. * **A credits estimate** for that action. It is an estimate; the meter on the run is what you are actually charged. The models are never averaged. The move that wins a prompt on ChatGPT is not the move that wins the same prompt on Perplexity, and one blended plan would fit neither. Where a model was read on two surfaces — a consumer answer and an API answer — the plan takes the surface with the most answers behind it and says which one it took, rather than averaging two different products. ## Where the rung comes from The same rule the [deciding-sources map](/measure/deciding-sources) follows: the static per-engine table until your own workspace has read at least 20 successful answers on that source, and your own history after that. Every rung says which of the two it came from. ## What the plan will not say * **No forecast.** No predicted rank, no predicted lift, no percentage that has not been measured. * **No movement language.** Nothing "improved" or "climbed": until a verified re-read, there is no proven change, and the plan ends on that sentence in so many words. * **No number without its n.** The plan states the evidence rung it is entitled to — `measured` at 7 or more answers, `published` between 2 and 6, `hypothesis` at one. ## When we read it again Every plan ends with when the answer gets re-read. If nothing has scheduled one yet, it says **"after the first action lands"** rather than naming a date nothing is going to keep. ## Where to find it * In **chat**, whenever you ask how to win a prompt — the agent follows the same procedure and shows you the sections per model. * As the [MCP tool](/mcp/tools) **`win_plan`**. It takes a required `prompt` — a prompt id or the prompt's exact text — and an optional `days` window. Ask for a prompt you are losing; [`deciding_sources`](/measure/deciding-sources) says which those are. * There is no REST endpoint for it yet: `win_plan` is one of the [MCP-only tools](/api/endpoints#mcp-only-for-now). The plan is composed over the deciding-sources map rather than recomputed from the readings, so the map, the page and the tool can never disagree about which page decided an answer.